Last spring there was an email going around about the stimulus plan. The logic was that instead of spending $787 billion on “stuff”, we instead send $250k to every man, woman, and child in America. The spending that resulted from such an influx of cash would surely result in a revival of the economy. The problem was that the math was off a bit. $787 billion divided by 312 million people is not $250k apiece, it’s $2,500 (roughly) apiece. Not very stimulative.
Now let’s look at GM.
GM has roughly 285k employees as of 2008, per wikianswer. Let’s assume that is still correct. Divide $70 billion by 285k, and you get a whopping $245,000 apiece that we could have paid to every employee of GM.
However, we have already spent $20 billion. Ok. Make it $50 billion. That’s still $175,000 apiece. Not a bad gig for giving up your day job.
But this leaves retirees in the lurch for healthcare (the unfunded healthcare liability, or VEBA). Ok. Say that’s $20 billion. That still leaves $30 billion, or a whopping $105,000 per employee AFTER taking the retiree healthcare into account.
So instead of this nonsense about saving jobs, which is dubiously based on a return to profitability through a sudden bout of American car buying, lower cost structure, and a jolt of engineering and design prowess, we could have paid for the VEBA, sent everyone a check for $100k, and then sold the business to whomever wanted to operate it as an ongoing, streamlined concern.
Print this post
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You have failed to “peel the onion” far enough. There is real potential for a cascade effect. How does this break down when you go to level 2 and add in the jobs at dealerships, parts supplers, or advertising agencies?
level 3: Speaking of advertising, how many jobs would be lost in print, broadcasting and even web-site industries due to lost advertising revenue?
level 4: How many jobs are lost because those laid-off employees & retirees with reduced benefits stop spending money?
level 5: What happens to state & local government budgets due to larger outlays for social services to the unemployed?
True,but I personally have a real problem with either “solution”. Whether labor or management people, they are all part of the problem that got GM into this mess.
Bill Garrett