For over a year we have been dealing with the aftermath of slower and lower spending. The repercussions of an overall spending decline continue to echo through the economy, with unemployment and slack capital stock being the most evident signs. Our legislators are desperate to find a way out, and economists are debating the merits of more stimulus versus tax credits (a different form of stimulus) in order to pull job creation through the system. The problem is that all of this misses the forest for the trees - we are choosing to spend less as consumers and that is a GOOD THING. Cajoling, bribing, and in the end demanding that we spend more is not just irresponsible, but truly harmful.
The exasperation with this situation is not limited to one economic or political view. The differences are confined to the approach while the goal remains the same - get the economic engine going again through increased consumption.
A better policy would be to explore what we can and should do when faced with excessive unemployment created through slack consumption. Should we leave the unemployed on successively longer benefits (the state of NY is moving its unemployed benefits to 99 weeks)? Should we dredge up the CCC and WPA of the ’30s and ’40s, not only handling work that needs to be accomplished by brazenly tackling make-work programs (state parks in the middle of nowhere)? Or should we start down a path of cannibalizing market share, which would consist of identifying all of the industries that have moved overseas that we could quickly recapture through some targeted investment program, not through tariffs or a “guaranteed work” agreement?
I don’t know the answer, but I strongly believe that this is the question. The stimulus plan has not fulfilled its intended goal of containing unemployment below 8%. Most of the funds spent so far have served only to plug ever-widening budget gaps at the state and local level. If that is the goal, to use federal funds to keep states solvent so that they can maintain their employment rolls beyond their own fiscal abilities, then let’s be clear about it. As we go down the path of ever-increasing federal budget deficits, we need to understand exactly what we are getting for our increased future burdens.
Print this post
You must be logged in to post a comment.
A very brave soul, indeed. To say, “I don’t know the answer, ”
Those with the printing presses and power seem determined to double down on their past failures. They don’t realize that ‘the market’ is dealing the cards. They are playing losing hands to their fullest extent while claiming the dealer has failed.
I will take your humble admisson and clear description of the ill fated goal over the arrogance of ego everyday.
With that clarity we have a chance to allow time for the reallocation of assets into some new bubble.
You candidly admit you don’t know the answer. I have been reading Web of Debt by Ellen Hodgson Brown, who gives the answer in clear and certain terms with multiple examples from history where THE ANSWER has been tried and ALWAYS proved to be a resounding success. Anyone who doesn’t believe me should get the book and decide for themselves. Hint, it doesn’t involve a return to the gold standard.
It takes a braver soul to know and try to implement the answer. Lincoln and JFK were assassinated for it. I suspect a lot of economic gurus also know but hold their tongues for fear of repercussions.
It’s worth noting that hardly a day goes by the environmentalists tell us an economy that relies on continuous growth is a bad thing, and that we consume too much resources and energy as it is. Meanwhile the economists tell us we need more growth to stimulate the economy. What’s wrong with this picture?
Meanwhile we’re stuck with a low or zero growth scenario whether we like it or not. The solution may be simpler than many economists think. Why not a reduction of work hours rather than companies cutting staff? Wouldn’t that be a good thing in a time when it seems everyone is in a hurry, stressed out, and it all causes symptoms like stress related illnesses or road rage?
The question has been asked many times of how in this day in age when there are more productivity gains and time saving inventions than at any other time in history, why are we in more of a hurry than ever before? It makes no sense at all and it’s long overdue to turn that increased productivity into a better, more civilized, more balanced, and all around more sensible way of life.