We’ve written about the Amazon Kindle in prior posts, specifically on it power as a disruptive technology to revolutionize the centuries-old industry of book publishing. (We use the Amazon Kindle by name by personal choice, but competing e-book readers such as Sony’s are certainly part of the revolution too.)
Now, we read in the New York Times that the revolution is coming to the public library (see “Off the Shelf, Onto the Laptop, Libraries Turn to Digital Books“).
Thus far, libraries have barely gotten their feet wet. But the changing economics of the industry make us believe that e-books will quickly become a large percentage of new purchases. In explaining the model, the Times writes,
Most digital books in libraries are treated like printed ones: only one borrower can check out an e-book at a time, and for popular titles, patrons must wait in line just as they do for physical books. After two to three weeks, the e-book automatically expires from a reader’s account.Some librarians suggest that because digital books never wear out, take up no shelf space and could, in theory, be read by multiple people at the same time, the purchasing model for e-books should be different than it is for print…
But some publishers worry that the convenience of borrowing books electronically could ultimately cut into sales of print editions.
Publishers are right to worry. They saw what happened to the music recording industry, and they shudder to think that it can happen to them too. But like it or not, it will happen, in some form or another.
The competitive forces of capitalism — made all the sharper by the deepest and longest recession since the Great Depression — will continually lower prices for consumers when not restricted. The delivery of intellectual property via electronic means — be it software, music, or a book — is virtually free, as is reproduction of the material. It’s also “greener” and better for the environment, requiring less physical plant, storage space, and fuel. The price savings here represent “good deflation,” the innovation-driven kind that makes our society as a whole richer. (This is not to be confused with “bad deflation,” which is due to falling final demand.)
Piracy is a problem, but not an insurmountable one. Microsoft manages to remain profitable despite widespread piracy of its software, and it mitigates this with product keys. Apple experimented with digital rights management to avoid MP3 piracy, though this has been less successful.
Authors, like musicians, may have to find a new business model. Perhaps they could generate revenues through consulting services the same way that musicians do concert tours? It’s hard to say exactly how this will all play out. Authors (alas, ourselves included) may find book publishing less lucrative in the future, though we believe most of the pain will be felt not by the authors but by the middlemen that are increasingly becoming obsolete.
It’s hard to know what direction the industry will go and who will be left standing once the dust settles. But that is the beauty of a revolution — it will be fun to watch!
Charles Sizemore, CFA
Co-author of the recently-published Boom or Bust: Understanding and Profiting from a Changing Consumer Economy
Print this post
You must be logged in to post a comment.
In the 19th century, Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities was published as a “serial novel” as were several other masterpieces by Dickens and other wonderful 19th Century authors. Since Dickens published his own series, he didn’t hand most of the profit to a publisher middle man. Just as HSDent sells newsletter subscriptions, perhaps authors in the future will shift almost exclusively to “self-publication” via the Internet. Considering the revenues generated by Google via Internet advertising, its not hard to imagine that this model could be adapted to the publishing industry. Movie rights could be retained, of course, by the authors. Perhaps an online community could evolve that would be the ‘Net’s equivalent of American Idol for the variouos genres of literature, e.g. novels (of various types), poetry, short stories, screen plays, etc., where the next great authors couldb be “discovered.”
Ron,
I too have wondered about this potential for “disintermediation” of the publishers. They played an important role as middlemen for most of the past couple centuries, but their reason for existing in their current form is waning. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out. Perhaps the old “serial novel” will become new again!
CLS
Recently Jeff Bezos was delivering a speech in which he said that when both the e-book and hard copy are available to the consumer, 48% of the sales go to the ebook market. That seems like a pretty high number for a new market. It looks like S-curve economics is hitting the e-book market. This also suggests the market is ripe to adopt this technology no matter how much the older generation says that it loves the smell and feel of the book in their hand. This is kinda like the older generation suggesting that they just like the feel and smell of the buggy whip.
Clint, I like the buggy whip analogy. Well done!
CLS